SEC Sues Issuer Over Internet “Pre-IPO” Offering
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September 14, 2000, it filed a civil lawsuit against 1stBuy.com, Inc. (1stBuy) and its founder and CFO, Roger D. Pringle. The SECs action pertains to an Internet stock offering conducted by 1stBuy during 1999 and early 2000 in which the company raised approximately $3.8 million from 1,200 investors nationwide.
While the offering was conducted pursuant to Regulation A, the issuer promoted the offering as a “pre-IPO” offering. The SEC claims that the defendants were inducing investments through false and misleading statements about the timing of a purported IPO, the projected value of its stock and the ability of the company to generate stockholder returns. The SECs complaint further alleges that the 1stBuy offering failed to meet the delivery and timing requirements of Regulation A in violation of the registration provisions of the Securities Act.
The SEC alleges that in statements made on 1stBuys website and in unsolicited e-mail messages, the defendants described 1stBuys offering as a “pre-IPO” offering and claimed that an IPO price range of $12 – $18 had already been set. The defendants further projected that a $5,000 investment would grow 1,200% in just one year and an additional 21,000% over the following three years. The defendants also represented that after the conclusion of its small business offering, 1stBuy would have a market capitalization of over $28 million and would easily meet the listing requirements of the NASDAQ small capitalization market.
In reality, the SEC claims, 1stBuy was rejected by the one brokerage firm it approached about underwriting an IPO; the projected returns had no basis in fact; the company failed to meet NASDAQ listing requirements; and the $28 million market capitalization figure was based on arbitrary and unsupported share price figure.
1stBuy and Pringle, without admitting or denying any of the allegations of the SECs complaint, simultaneously agreed to settle the charges that they violated the fraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws. Under terms of the settlement, 1stBuy and Pringle will be permanently enjoined from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition, the proposed judgment orders Pringle to pay a civil penalty of $25,000.
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Securities Laws, Rules and Regulations
Securities Law Calendar
Securities Law Blog
SECLaw News Update
Securities Law Event Calendar
Advertise With Us / / Link to Us / / Help / / Disclaimer / / Privacy / / Contact Us
Copyright 2010. VGIS Communications LLC. All Rights Reserved. VGIS Communications, LLC – 41 Watchung Plaza, Suite 249, Montclair, New Jersey 07042 – 973-509-7333. Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial adviser before acting upon the information contained in this article. For additional information, contact Mark J. Astarita, Esq., a partner in the law firm of Beam & Astarita, LLC, who represents clients in a wide variety of finance related matters. Mr. Astarita can be contacted by email at email@example.com.
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC