]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives Award Vacated As Irrational
Awarding Individuals Damage for Harm Done to A Corporation Results in Vacature of the Award
Spear Leeds & Kellogg v. Bullseye Securities, Inc., No. 5435, 2002 N.Y. App. LEXIS 1563 (N.Y. App. Div., 1Dept., 2/14/02).
Award Challenge * Vacatur of Award * Exceeding Powers * Manifest Disregard * Irrationality * Remand to Arbitrators * Rationale of Award.
Individual claimants, as a matter of law, cannot be compensated by arbitrators on a cause of action stating wrongdoing to a corporation.
The trial court vacated this NASD Award (ID #99-02963, NYC, 10/8/99), granting $1.25 million to the co-owners of Bullseye Securities, Joseph and Eva Roffler, for acts allegedly committed by a Spear Leeds employee, Joseph Schettino.
There are two problems with the Award, Spear Leeds successfully persuades the Court: first, it awards damages to the Rofflers in their individual capacities when the alleged wrongs occurred to their corporate broker-dealer; secondly, it assesses damages against Spear Leeds, presumably for the conduct of its employee, but the employee was released from any liability (without explanation, the Court observes).
These two defects led the lower court to vacate the Award (see SLA 2000-09 for summary) and remand the matter for a new hearing before the [NASD]. This Court affirms on grounds that the Panel majority (the only lawyer on the panel dissented, the Court notes) exceeded its powers, manifestly disregarded the law, and, by rendering an inherently inconsistent result, evinced irrationality in its Award. Where, as here, there is no independent basis for finding SLK solely liable for over a million dollars in damages, apart from one grounded upon the negligence of its employee, the award must be set aside as irrational . (SLC Ref. No. 02-10-03)
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to email@example.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys