]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives Ernst & Young Reports No NLSS Bias
Study Finds PIABA Charges Inaccurate
Last year around this time, a controversy was smoldering over charges of bias in the NASD-DR Neutral List Selection System — so we did a follow-up.
We can best recall for readers the dialogue between NASD and the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association (PIABA) by excerpting passages from 11 SAC 7(8).
There, we reported that then-NASD President Richard Ketchum had written a letter, dated August 1, 2000, to then-PIABA President Mark Maddox, in which he stated that accounting firm Ernst & Young was being retained, at NASD-DR’s expense, to examine the Association’s NLSS processes. This undertaking came in response to Mr. Maddox’s demand for third-party verification (SAA 00-31) of NASD denials after PIABA publicly charged foul play. According to our report, “PIABA had accused NASD of ‘rigging securities arbitration panels,’ on the basis of information that the expertise factor, built into NLSS under NASD Rule 10308(b)(4)(B), was constructed with a bias toward seniority. NASD quickly issued a denial and Mr. Ketchum wrote to the PIABA Board, demanding a retraction (SAA Spec. Del., 7/21/00). He c
ategorically stated that ‘our system does not choose arbitrators based on seniority when specific expertise is requested.'” Subsequently, Seth Lipner, the incoming President of PIABA, wrote an article (“The NLSS ‘Expertise’ Function Should Go, 11 SAC 8(1)), enlarging upon the issue.
Ernst & Young has now issued its report and findings, we understand from NASD-DR Senior Vice President George H. Friedman. E&Y’s independent verification study, he observed, found, “that NLSS operated as NASD said and as provided for in the rule filing and approved order.”
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to firstname.lastname@example.org. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys