]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives FAA Preempts State Code Unless Arbitration Clause Incorporates the Code.
Arbitration therefore mandatory for signatories and third party beneficiaries
Nyko v. First Union Securities, Inc., B150211 (Cal. App., 2Dist., 2/7/02). Appealability * Arbitrability * FAA * Preemption-Federal * Waiver * State Law, Applicability of * Choice of Law * Breadth of Agreement.
FAA preempts state arbitration code unless arbitration clause incorporates California Code and renders arbitration mandatory for signatories and nonsignatory beneficiaries.
Plaintiffs Nyko, Marble Tek and Massan, companies controlled by Bahman Kaveh, appeal from a $40,000 arbitration judgment in their favor rendered against Freddy Lee and First Union Securities. Common law claims resulted from theft and embezzlement of $700,000 from the companies by their investment advisor Fung Yen, who deposited checks in plaintiffs First Union accounts and a fraudulent account set up by Fung Yen at Wells Fargo.
Lee and First Union successfully compelled plaintiffs claims to arbitration while other non-arbitrable claims against Wells Fargo remained in a court action, which the court stayed pending arbitration within 120 days. Arbitration was ordered as to Nyko and Marble Tek under securities and commodity account agreements with First Union signed by Kaveh. Arbitration was also ordered as to Massan, due to its depositing checks into Marble Teks account.
Although the Court discusses the effect of accepting the benefits of a judgment as impliedly waiving the right to appeal, it stops short of deciding on this basis in that plaintiffs were required to convert the arbitration Award into a judgment to be able to appeal the order compelling arbitration.
The Court finds other grounds for denying reversal: Even if there is a potential for inconsistent results, the FAA mandates arbitration. Significantly, the Court distinguishes Volt, holding that the California Code of Civil Procedure is preempted by the FAA unless, as in Volt, the arbitration agreement expressly incorporates the statute. However, the Court finds no abuse of discretion by the trial court in ordering arbitration in view of the strong policy in favor of arbitration and the lack of any extreme miscarriage of justice. There is also the difference in the issues in the Wells Fargo court case, which relates to the Banks defenses to forged check claims. (S. Anderson) (EIC: Our thanks to Renan I. Sugarman, First Union Securities, Chicago, IL for alerting us to this decision.) (SLC Ref. No. 02-12-01)
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to email@example.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys