Investigative Transcripts are not Confidential – SECLaw.com

   

]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives Investigative Transcripts are not Confidential in Private Litigation

Kirkland vs. Superior Court of LA County, 2002 Ca. App. Lexis 105 (Cal. App., 2Dist., 1/9/02

Discovery Issues * Enforcement Practices/Procedures * Record of Proceedings (Regulatory). Transcripts of testimony in connection with a regulatory investigation are not confidential and may be produced in a subsequent private lawsuit.

Guess? Inc. sued Kirkland for fraud arising out of a sham loan transaction. The transaction allegedly caused Guess? to enter into a failed licensing agreement with PLB, a company which had retained Kirkland as a financial advisor.

During the course of the litigation, Guess? discovered that the SEC had conducted an investigation of the sham transaction and had taken Kirkland’s testimony on the record. Kirkland acknowledged that he had a transcript of the testimony and Guess? demanded that he produce it. He refused on the ground that SEC proceedings are “private” and “confidential.”

A special master ordered the transcript to be produced and Kirkland thereupon filed a writ of mandamus in this Appellate Court seeking to overturn the order. The Appellate Court, however, affirms the trial court’s decision.

Witnesses who testify or produce documents to the SEC usually have the right to obtain copies of the transcripts and where they have done so, there is no cognizable claim of confidentiality or privacy. The Court rejects Kirkland’s argument that, in the absence of judicial protection for the SEC’s confidential investigatory process, witnesses will not be as forthcoming as they otherwise might be. (P. Dubow: While the appeal was pending, the SEC publicly issued a cease and desist order against Kirkland based on an offer of settlement that he made, but this had no effect on the Court’s decision.) (SLC Ref. No. 2002-06-04)


Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to help@sacarbitration.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com


Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article. 


Return to The Securities Law Home Page 

Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys

]]> ]]>