NASD Arbitration Statistics 10/20 – Securities Law News Update, From the Securities Law Home Page

   

]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives NASD Arbitration Stats – 10/02
Filings Up 38% over 2000, Open vs. Closed Gap Widens

NASD STATS, 10/02: The number of new arbitration filings has exceeded the average number of filings for 2001 in every month of 2002 and the monthly figure for October 2002 represents the largest gain this year. There were 715 new filings in October, bringing the total number of new submissions for 2002 to 6,405.

Coincidentally, 715 filings were reported in October 2001 as well, so that October was also the largest filing month last year. However, the World Trade Center attacks artificially depressed the numbers for September 2001 and probably inflated them in October 2001.

The 6,405 claims tally stands 12% ahead of the same period in 2001, when the total new-case tally stood at 5,697. It is 38% ahead of the 4,646 cases filed at this point in 2000. October is an important month for mediation at NASD.

In 2001, Settlement Month was extended into November, again because of the terrorist attacks. This year, some 128 new cases entered agreement in October, close to twice the average for previous months in 2002, and the total increase in “Cases in Agreement” in mediation stands 5% ahead of last year.

The real improvement case in the “Cases Closed” area, which moved to 8% higher than last year from 3% in September; yet, the settlement percentage, a historically high 83%, was maintained.

The primary target of heightened complaint from customers on the product side continues to be mutual funds, about 20% of the time, and, in terms of the sales practices, unsuitability charges. Suitability claims are up about 70% from last year. If one assumes that, about 20% of the new cases are industry-related matters, then four of every five customer claims asserts a breach of fiduciary duty, and one of every two claims charges negligence, unsuitability, misrepresentation and/or failure to supervise.

The closed case statistics reveal the problem that this persistent rise in filings represents for the forum. During the last dozen years, there have been only three years in which closed cases exceeded the number of new filings. At the current rate this year, even though the closed case rate is up 8% over 2001, the gap between incoming volume and outgoing caseload will be about 1,700 cases. In percentage terms, that means that, in one year, the carryover volume will increase about 50% over the accumulated carryover from the past dozen years (est. 3,417 cases). (SAC Ref. No. 02-46-03


Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to help@sacarbitration.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com

Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article. 


Return to The Securities Law Home Page 

Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys

]]> ]]>