]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives Rapoport Update – New Developments regarding Out of State Attorneys in Florida.
Developments and Reactions
The cover story of a recent edition of the Daily Business Review, a Florida periodical, focused on the state Supreme Courts decision to ban an out-of-state lawyer from representing parties in securities arbitrations in the State. The story Down the Chute, (3/24/03, p. A8) offers some insight on developments and reactions to The Florida Bar v. Rapoport decision.
The Florida Bar has not offered any official directive guiding out-of-state attorneys representing parties in Florida arbitrations, so we found some of the items in this article worthy to repeat:
Reactions: According to the article, [d]ozens of arbitration hearings have been postponed, as out-of-state attorneys turn cases over to or associate with local counsel. Many inside counsel are taking the same route. Some out-of-state attorneys on the Claimants side have also turned over representation to local counsel. The Florida Bars UPL (Unlicensed Practice of Law) Section has been inundated with calls from attorneys seeking guidance.
Florida Bar Position: While there have been no official directives, Lori Holcomb, the UPL director has told SAC and has repeated in this article that the Florida Bar views the Rapoport matter as an isolated incident. While the Bar will continue to investigate specific complaints, she is reported here as saying that there is an important distinction between Rapoports case and the more typical scenario of out-of-state brokerage firms sending their in-house counsel to Florida to handle an arbitration proceeding . Rapoport had moved to Florida permanently years ago and had set up a practice here without a Florida license.
Current Events: Mr. Rapoport has sought rehearing before the Florida Supreme Court. New ABA Model Rules, which promise greater freedom for attorneys working in out-of-state venues, are under review by an 18-member Commission in Florida and recommendations are expected to be filed this month for possible adoption by the Bars Board. Approval by the Florida Supreme Court is the final step in that process.
Copyright 2003 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to email@example.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys