Prior NASD Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot Be Used at Trial
Markowski v. Attel Bank Intl., Ltd., No. 3D98-3336 (Fla. Dist. Ct., 3Dist., 6/14/00): On appeal from a bench trial, Defendant Markowski challenges the judgment below.
In this matter, Attel Bank sought to enforce and collect on a promissory note executed by Markowski in favor of Attel to compromise a good faith dispute of civil and administrative claims against Markowski, who had sold securities to the bank. Markowski testified as the sole defense witness.
In reversing and remanding for retrial before a different judge, the Court held the trial courts admission of NASD disciplinary findings and a SEC consent decree against Markowski, to impeach his credibility, was improper under Floridas Evidence Code.
The Court noted that the lower courts error in admitting the evidence of prior bad acts is subject to the harmless error doctrine. However, in this case, the admission of prejudicial evidence was not harmless error, where the trial court reached its conclusion based on the credibility of the witnesses. (R. Clemente) (SAC Ref. No. 2000-19-003)
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to firstname.lastname@example.org. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com