]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives Dispute Between Two Brokers is Subject to Arbitration, Even Without Written Agreement
Court Compels Arbitration Based on NASD Rule 10101
Scott (Relator Zachary C.), In Re, 2003 WL 557009 (Tex. App., 2/27/03). Arbitrability * Arbitration Agreement (Form U-4) * FAA (§4 Motion to Compel) * SRO Rules (NASD Rules 10101, 10201 & 10216) * Breadth of Agreement.
Disputes, solely between associated persons, are arbitrable under Rule 10101. Scott and Truelson, both associated persons with Prudential, entered into a partnership to share commissions, with Scott ultimately to take over Truelson’s book upon his retirement. The partnership agreement did not contain an arbitration clause. Truelson filed an action for breach of the partnership agreement and the district court denied Scott’s motion to compel arbitration. The Court of Appeals “conditionally” granted Scott’s petition for Writ of Mandamus.
In applying a two-step analysis, the Court first concludes that the Federal Arbitration Act applies, noting that the subject matter of the partnership agreement involves interstate commerce and that both associated persons signed Forms U-4. The question whether the particular dispute was arbitrable is next addressed, the Court concluding that NASD Rule 10101(b) is ambiguous and susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation. Nevertheless, the Court holds that, if an agreement is governed by the FAA, any doubts concerning the scope of the arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration. (SLC Ref. No. 2003-11-02)
Copyright 2003 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to firstname.lastname@example.org. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys