News

Analysis

Subpoena Power Not Available for Discovery

Arbitral Supoena Power Does Not Provide for Pre-Hearing Production by Non-Parties Hay Group, Inc. vs. EBS Acquisition Corp., Third Circuit HAY GROUP, INC. v. E.B.S. ACQUISITION CORP., No. 03-1161/1162 (3rd Cir., 3/12/04). In arbitrations subject to the Federal Arbitration Act, arbitral subpoena power does not extend to requiring pre-hearing production […]

Analysis

Employment exclusion reviewed

Supreme Court and Arbitration – 2002   SUPREME COURT & ARBITRATION: The U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in the Circuit City v. Adams case on Monday, concerning Section 1’s “contract of employment” exclusion. The Ninth Circuit gave a broad reading to the exclusionary provision in the decision below, holding that […]

Analysis Arbitration

Mistake of Law is Not Disregard of Law

California Court upholds arbitration award Baraban Securities, Inc. v. Viersen & Watts, Case No. CV 00-02931 (WJR) (C.D. Calif., 4/18/00): Baraban alleges manifest disregard of the law in its petition to vacate the underlying NASD Award (NASD ID #97-02538, Portland, OR, 2/23/00), claiming that the claims were encompassed by a […]

Arbitration News

Selling Away Claimants can compel arbitration

Vestax Securities Corporation vs. McWood, No. 00-1936 (6th Cir., 2/14/02) Agreement to Arbitrate * Arbitration Agreement (SRO Requirement) * Scope of Agreement * Selling Away * SRO Rules * Statutory Definitions (“Customer”) * SRO Rules (NASD Rule 10301). Investors who purchased securities through a broker-dealer’s agents are “customers,” for purposes […]

News

Sawtelle Waddell Reed Punitve Damages Reinstated

On Remand, Arbitrators Continue to Award $25 Million in Punitive Damages, Despite Court Decision UPDATE, SAWTELLE v. WADDELL & REED, INC., NASD ID #97-03642 (9/4/03). Incredibly, the three Arbitrators who were directed to reconsider an excessive award of punitive damages have done so and have decided that they were right […]

Analysis Law

Outsiders as RICO conspirators

Archives Securities Case Briefs: Outsiders as RICO conspirators Brouwer vs. Raffensperger, Hughes & Co. Brouwer v. Raffensperger, Hughes & Co., 199 F.3d 961 (7th Cir., 1/13/00): This case concerns the limitations under the federal RICO statute on liability of an underwriter and a law firm that assisted in note financings […]

Compel FINRA arbitration by non-customer
Analysis Arbitration

Refusal to Grant Adjournment

Third Time is not a charm Whale Securities Co., L.P. v. Godfrey, No. 565 (App. Div., 1Dept., 4/4/00): When SAC summarized the decision below, 10 SAC 9(16), we set out the facts in detail and posed the question: “How would you decide?” The question at hand, whether the Arbitrators engaged […]