“Clearing firms are generally not responsible to customers for the actions of an introducing broker”
Warren v. Tacher, C.A. No. 3:99-CV-806-R (W.D. Ky., 6/2/00):
We mentioned this recent ruling in this well-known arbitration case in last weeks Arbitration Alert (00-26). The Award under challenge in this proceeding constituted the largest punitive damages award in SACs Award Database (NASD ID #97-04772, Louisville, 9/20/99).
Ironically, it was the investor-Claimants who initiated the vacatur proceeding.
As the Court notes, the $15 million punitive damages and $4.7 million compensatory damages awards are unlikely to be collected from the two Kensington Wells principals, Steven Vornea and Salvador Tacher, against whom the Arbitrators ruled. Messrs. Tacher and Vornea are both in bankruptcy proceedings and Tacher has been indicted for fraud. Petitioners seek confirmation of the Award in part, but request vacatur of the Panels dismissal of the claims against KWIs clearing broker, Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.
They claim that the Panel acted in manifest disregard of the law, committed arbitrator misconduct for refusing to hear evidence, and exceeded their powers by dismissing their claims against Bear Stearns prior to discovery and a full-blown evidentiary hearing.
While the Panel clearly refused to hear evidence in dismissing the case against Bear Stearns, the real issue is whether that refusal prejudiced Claimants through the exclusion of material evidence. The Court is skeptical that discovery, if provided, would overcome the panels decision . Clearing firms are generally not responsible to customers for the actions of an introducing broker and do not owe fiduciary duties to the customer, and courts have confirmed pre-hearing dismissals on these grounds.
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to email@example.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys and New York Securities Lawyer
- SEC Proposes to Enhance Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies About ESG Investment Practices
- SEC Obtains Emergency Relief to Halt Pre-IPO Stock Fraud Scheme by Unregistered Broker-Dealer
- TradeZero America Settles SEC Case Re: Meme Stock Trading Halts
- SEC Charges BNY Mellon Investment Adviser for Misstatements and Omissions Concerning ESG Considerations
- SEC’s ALJ Problems…Again
- Representation of Investors in EminiFX
- Work-from-home stocks are getting crushed
- SEC Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rules on Climate-Related Disclosures, Reopens Comment Periods for Proposed Rules Regarding Private Fund Advisers and Regulation ATS
- What Does a Securities Lawyer Do?
- SEC Charges NVIDIA Corporation with Inadequate Disclosures about Impact of Cryptomining
- SEC Nearly Doubles Size of Enforcement’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit
- SEC Issues Nearly $3.5 Million Award to Four Whistleblowers
- SEC Charges CEO and President of Synergy Settlement Services with Fraudulent Operation of Special Needs Pooled Trusts
- OMWI Reports Highlight Progress in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
- Twitter Board Fears Losing Their Job?