Castelein vs. Corporate Securities Group
CASTELEIN v. CORPORATE SECURITIES GROUP, INC., NASD ID #99-04213 (Charlotte, NC). Our copy of the Award does not reflect an issue date, but the decision, we understand, was rendered this month. The decision refers to the brokers criminal plea agreement in federal court, in assessing a compensatory award of $4,118,779, plus 8% interest, so the employing broker-dealer, CSG, nka as Wachovia Securities Financial Network, Inc., and the clearing broker-dealer, Bear Stearns, faced an uphill battle. In three months during 1997, according to an excellent Case Summary by the Arbitrators, a deposit of $12.5 million into a CSG account dwindled dramatically, as funds were transferred by wire from the account and losses occurred from heavy trading activity. Claimant charged that he was led to believe that Bear Stearns was his broker, not CSG, but the Panel clearly focuses on the broker and CSG. Among the remarks made by the Panel in the Other Issues section, with respect to a change of counsel, was this observation: [i]t became apparent during the fifth day of the [nine days of] hearings that counsel for Respondent CSG had not been provided complete information by his client, resulting in such counsels making untrue statements both in Respondent CSGs answer to the Statement of Claim and in Respondent CSGs opening argument and eliciting false testimony from a witness. After six days of hearings counsel withdrew from the case, requiring the corporate Respondent Bear Stearns [there was joint representation at that point] and Respondent CSG to retain new [and separate] counsel for the balance of the hearings. The Panels Findings on the merits of the claims run six pages and carefully dissect the allegations and the responsibilities of various individuals and the parties. Bear Stearns was relieved of the claims for punitive damages before the hearings closed. The Panel acknowledged that Bear, as the clearing agent, had no contact with Claimant, could not supervise the broker, nor did it have any obligation to do so. Still, it had a role in effectuating the wire transfers from the account and, there, the Panel finds fault. Inadequate controls permitted Respondent Reid to disguise transfers from Claimants account to third parties by using Claimants name as both sender and receiver, but with an account number [that belonged to a third party]. It is fairly clear that this deficiency provides the limited basis for the $200,000 assessed against Bear Stearns as compensatory damages. CSG and Mr. Reid are held jointly liable for the $4.1 million and for a thrice-compensatory award of $12.3 million in punitive damages. $36,450 in forum fees are split between Bear and CSG. (ed: A quick scan of SACs Award Database reveals no prior punitive damages awards against a major broker-dealer above $5 million; of course, CSG was not viewed as a national house and was not part of First Union/Wachovia when these events occurred.) (SAC Ref. No. 03-04-01)
Copyright 2003 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to firstname.lastname@example.org. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards available anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys